Tuesday, 19 Nov 2024

Woman instructed for dying man's farm to be left to her son, sister claims in court

A sister of a farmer whose will is being contested believes a solicitor got his instructions for the will from another sister, whose son was left the entire 54 acre farm in Wexford.

Teresa Doyle, along with her siblings Joseph, William and Elizabeth Buckley, are suing their nephew Richard Cooper junior over the will for the farm.

The property in Caim, near Enniscorthy was owned by Michael Buckley who died in hospital from cancer on March 20, 2011.

They claim it was made under undue influence when Michael was not capable of doing so days before his death.

Wexford Circuit Court previously condemned the will and Mr Cooper appealed to the High Court.

On the fourth day of the appeal, Stephen Lanigan-O’Keefe, for Mr Cooper, asked Ms Doyle how did she think the solicitor who made the will, Jason Dunne, get the details which went into the document.

These included matters such as where Mr Buckley banked and that he did not have life insurance or a pension.

She believed the solicitor got the instructions from Sheila Cooper, Richard’s mother.

Ms Doyle disagreed she wanted the farm to be divided up and sold. “I am doing this to get justice for Michael”.

She denied this dispute had arisen because she was angry that Michael had made a will and she was now making sure that legal costs would be run up to ensure Richard did not get it. 

Earlier, she told her own counsel Michael Counihan that her family and Ms Cooper’s family had been close as they all lived within a short distance of each other in Enniscorthy.

After Michael first got sick in October 2010, around Christmas that year, Ms Doyle said she was told by Michael: “Would you believe she (Sheila) sent down Dick (Sheila’s husband) for me to give the place to Richard”.  

Ms Doyle said her brother added “it won’t be happening”.

Asked did she know how Richard and Michael got on, she said they were “always squabbling” and on one occasion Ms Cooper told her the two men were “at each other’s throats again”.

She took no notice until she heard later that Richard had knocked Michael to the ground, a claim which Richard has strongly denied in court.

She said Michael “had no time for the Coopers” even before Ms Cooper married Dick because Michael “knew Dick’s father and their relations were just up the road from us”.

There was never any mention of a will until a few days after Michael was buried, she said.  

Ms Cooper arrived in Ms Doyle’s house and said “by the way Richard got the farm”. When Ms Doyle expressed surprise, her sister allegedly said “you are making me very angry”.

She added: “This was not the Sheila I knew and I told her to stop shouting at me and I was very upset”.

She believed the will should never have been made because Michael was not capable of doing so.

Bobby Buckley (48), a son of Joseph, was another nephew who said that like Richard he worked on his uncle Michael’s farm as he was growing up and into adulthood.

He said at a family gathering in his home after Michael got sick, Ms Cooper brought up the question of a will. “I don’t remember her exact words but she said I want Richard to have it and I remember her tapping her finger on the table”.  

In relation to an alleged altercation between Richard and Michael, Bobby said Michael called him to the farm and told him Richard had “come down shouting and roaring that he was up to his eyes in debt”. He said Michael pointed to the ground and said “He (Richard) put me to the ground here the other day”.

Dick Cooper, Ms Cooper’s husband, said he did not think it was unusual for him and his wife to call to a local solicitor’s home to ask him to take the will at 8pm at night. He said they just happened to be passing by.

When that solicitor found Michael did not have testamentary capacity, he (Dick) called the firm Jason Dunne worked for because the office was just up the street from his workplace. Mr Dunne found Mr Buckley’s condition had improved and he successfully took the will.

Evidence has ended and the case was adjourned for parties to make legal submissions.

Source: Read Full Article

Related Posts