We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

The Duke of York, 61, yesterday filed papers in Manhattan asking for her case to be halted until the issue is resolved. His lawyers stated: “Evidence suggests that the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Ms Giuffre alleges she is a citizen of the State of Colorado, the evidence demonstrates that she is actually domiciled in Australia, where she has lived for all but two of the past 19 years.”

“At the time she filed this action, Ms Giuffre had an Australian driver’s licence and was living in aAU$1.9million (£1million) home in Perth, Western Australia, where she and her husband have been raising their three children. Ms Giuffre’s ties to Colorado are very limited.

“She has not lived there since at least 2019. It appears that Ms Giuffre only recently registered to vote in Colorado using her mother and stepfather’s mailing address there. Prince Andrew respectfully requests that the court order Ms Giuffre to respond to targeted written discovery requests.”

Ms Giuffre, 38, has used New York’s Child Victims Act to pursue the Duke for damages, alleging he sexually abused her on three occasions in 2001 when she was 17. He “absolutely and categorically” denies her claims.

See the latest Covid vaccine stats below and visit InYourArea for all the Covid vaccine latest

Ms Giuffre says she was taken to London where she was made to sleep with him while she was a “teen sex slave” of his then friend, paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein who killed himself in 2019.

Mum-of-three Ms Giuffre says in her suit: “Prince Andrew’s actions constitute sexual offences as defined in New York Penal Law Article 130”, including sexual misconduct, rape in the third degree and rape in the first degree.

Prince Andrew’s move is the latest attempt to have her case dismissed. He earlier launched a bid to have the lawsuit thrown out, calling it “unintelligible” and deliberately vague. He argued the law allowing her to sue in America was “unconstitutional”. Judge Lewis Kaplan will hear arguments on Tuesday.

Source: Read Full Article