Special counsel Robert Mueller said yesterday he was legally barred from charging President Donald Trump with a crime – but he pointedly emphasised that his Russia report did not exonerate the president.

If he could have cleared Mr Trump of obstruction of justice he “would have said so”, Mr Mueller said.

The special counsel’s remarks, his first in public since being tasked two years ago with investigating Russian interference to help Mr Trump win the 2016 presidential election, stood as a strong rebuttal to Mr Trump’s repeated claims that he was exonerated and that the inquiry was a “witch hunt” that found no crime.

Mr Mueller made clear he was barred from indicting a sitting president and that it was Congress’s job to hold the president accountable for any wrongdoing.

“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mr Mueller said. “We did not however make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.”

Under pressure to testify before Congress, Mr Mueller did not rule it out. But he seemed to warn lawmakers they won’t be pulling more detail out of him. His report is “my testimony”, Mr Mueller said, and he won’t go beyond what is written in the report.

He strongly indicated that Congress is the proper venue, not the criminal justice system, for deciding whether action should be taken against the president in connection with allegations that Mr Trump and aides obstructed the investigation.

Mr Trump, who has repeatedly and falsely claimed that Mr Mueller’s report cleared him of obstruction of justice, modified that contention somewhat shortly after the special counsel’s remarks. He tweeted, “There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent. The case is closed!”

Mr Mueller’s comments, one month after his report on Russian efforts to help Mr Trump win the presidency, appeared intended to both justify the legitimacy of his investigation against complaints by the president and to explain his decision to not reach a conclusion on whether Mr Trump had obstructed justice.

Indicting Mr Trump, he said firmly, was “not an option” in light of a Justice Department legal opinion that says a sitting president cannot be charged. But, he said, the absence of a conclusion should not be mistaken for an exoneration of the president.

“The opinion says the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mr Mueller said, referring to the Justice Department legal opinion.

That would shift the next move, if any, to Congress, and the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, which would investigate further or begin any impeachment effort, commented quickly. It falls to Congress to respond to the “crimes, lies and other wrongdoing of Mr Trump – and we will do so”, said Jerrold Nadler.

Mr Trump has blocked the committee’s subpoenas and other efforts to dig into the Trump-Russia issue, insisting Mr Mueller’s report has settled everything.

Mr Mueller’s statement came amid demands for him to testify on Capitol Hill about his findings, and tension with Attorney General William Barr over the handling of Mr Mueller’s report.

That report found no criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to tip the outcome of the 2016 presidential election in Mr Trump’s favour over Democrat Hillary Clinton. But it also did not reach a conclusion on whether the president had obstructed justice.

Mr Barr has said he was surprised Mr Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether the president had criminally obstructed justice, though Mr Mueller in his report and again in his public statement yesterday said that he had no choice.

Mr Barr decided on his own that the evidence was not sufficient to support an obstruction charge against Mr Trump.

“Under longstanding department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office,” Mr Mueller said. “That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view that, too, is prohibited.”

Mr Mueller, for his part, complained privately to Mr Barr that he believed a four-page letter from the attorney general summarising his main conclusions did not adequately represent his findings.

Mr Mueller also appeared to put Congress on notice that he would not break new ground in the event he testifies on Capitol Hill. “I do not believe it is appropriate for me to speak further about the investigation or to comment on the actions of the Justice Department before Congress,” he said.

Facebook is enabling fake news – Pelosi

US HOUSE speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday said that Facebook’s refusal to take down an altered video of her shows that the company’s leaders were active contributors to online disinformation and “willing enablers” of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Her comments, her first public response to the video since it began spreading online last week, revealed a dramatic escalation of tensions between the Democratic leader and the world’s most popular social network.

“We have said all along, ‘poor Facebook, they were unwittingly exploited by the Russians’. I think wittingly, because right now they are putting up something that they know is false. I think it’s wrong,” she said.

Ms Pelosi added: “I think they have proven – by not taking down something they know is false – that they were willing enablers of the Russian interference in our election.”

Facebook acknowledged the video was intentionally misleading, but declined to remove it, saying: “We don’t have a policy that stipulates that the information you post on Facebook must be true.”

It said that it has heavily reduced the video’s appearances in news feeds, and that the video now plays alongside a small informational box linking to fact-checks indicating that the video is false.

When someone attempts to share the video, a pop-up box tells the user there is “additional reporting” on the video, but it does not say outright that it is false.

Source: Read Full Article