Nicola Sturgeon branded ‘betrayer’ as independence supporters turned on First Minister
We will use your email address only for sending you newsletters. Please see our Privacy Notice for details of your data protection rights.
The Scottish First Minister has pushed hard for a second independence vote since the UK voted to leave the EU in 2016. Ms Sturgeon and the Scottish National Party (SNP) have argued that, given the party’s dominance in Holyrood, it has the mandate to take Scotland out of the union and back into the EU as an independent nation. After the 2019 general election, which the SNP won comfortably in Scotland, Ms Sturgeon formally requested powers from Westminster to hold a second independence referendum – but the notion was firmly rejected by the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson.
Mr Johnson said: “You and your predecessor (Alex Salmond) made a personal promise that the 2014 independence referendum was a ‘once in a generation’ vote.
“The people of Scotland voted decisively on that promise to keep our United Kingdom together, a result which both the Scottish and UK governments committed to respect in the Edinburgh Agreement.”
Since then, Ms Sturgeon has attempted to gain powers to call a second independence vote with a section 30 order.
But the patience of some independence advocates had already worn thin, as prominent independence supporters indicated their displeasure at the perceived lack of action by the First Minister.
After December’s election, Ms Sturgeon pleaded for more patience from Scottish nationalists, saying “to pretend that there are shortcuts or clever wheezes that can magically overcome the obstacles we face would be to do the independence cause a disservice”.
Popular and influential pro-independence website – Wings Over Scotland – announced at the time it would stop posting until Ms Sturgeon was gone in an article titled “The Betrayer”.
Stuart Campbell, who launched the site in 2011, said: “Five years and two months have passed since Sturgeon assumed the office of First Minister on 20 November 2014.
“Since that day, the people of Scotland have gone to the ballot box on SIX occasions, and on every one the SNP have won a clear victory – in four of those six elections, by a margin of more than 20 percentage points over their nearest opponent.
“And yet the party whose primary/sole reason for existence is achieving independence for Scotland has taken those six resounding mandates in half a decade and delivered absolutely nothing with them.
“For all those millions of votes, Scotland is not one inch closer to its independence now than it was on 19 November 2014.”
He added: “The Scottish Government sat on its hands and did nothing but accumulate a pile of worthless mandates while the clock ticked down, and now Scotland stares into the abyss of another decade of destructive Tory rule.”
Polling last month by Panelbase shows 55 percent in favour of breaking with the union, with 45 percent against – an exact reversal of the 2014 referendum result.
But the sustained growth in support for independence will still not be enough on its own to secure a second referendum, public law expert Professor Aileen McHarg told Express.co.uk.
Sturgeon’s independence plans derailed after Scotland ‘lost billions’ [INSIGHT]
Nicola Sturgeon’s IndyRef2 hopes dashed as ‘polls won’t secure vote’ [ANALYSIS]
Nicola Sturgeon’s path to Indyref2 laid out as PM ‘powerless’ [INSIGHT]
She said: “The growth in support does not change the legal arguments. Either they have the power or they don’t – a mandate makes no difference.”
However, she also said that a perceived mandate could offer some encouragement nonetheless.
Professor McHarg added: “The reason a mandate is important though is because in 2011, when the SNP last won an overall majority, David Cameron’s agreement to facilitate a referendum at that point had a mandate.
“So the SNP will make it absolutely abundantly clear in their manifesto next year that they want a second referendum.
“If the SNP then gets an overall majority next May, then it will be difficult to dispute that mandate, but that’s a political argument.
“It doesn’t affect the legal argument, a mandate on its own can’t impact the powers of a devolved legislature.”
Source: Read Full Article